User Tools

Site Tools



This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

why_i_picked_dokuwiki [2017/12/04 15:38] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Why I picked dokuwiki ======
 +There are many wiki engines. The most famous is [[https://​​wiki/​MediaWiki|MediaWiki]],​ used by Wikipedia. **MediaWiki** has lots of features, high performance,​ high scalability,​ and a huge community. However, managing a MediaWiki installation is not simple: the content is spread over dozens of MySQL tables, making backup and recovery cumbersome. Also, some updates require lots of manual steps.
 +In contrast, [[https://​​|docuwiki]] doesn'​t need a database to work. The pages are stored in plain ''​.txt''​ files, in a sensible directory structure. So it's trivial to backup -- I can even do it with ''​git''​. And it's also simple to write scripts to create or edit pages automatically.
 +There are other wiki engines that store pages in plain text files. But among the ones I saw, **docuwiki** is the one that seems to be more widely used and supported. For example, it has lots of traslations,​ including Brazilian Portuguese, my native language.
 +After I had made my choice I found a tweet by Rasmus Lerdorf (creator of PHP) which pretty much nailed it: 
 +<​HTML><​blockquote class="​twitter-tweet"​ data-lang="​en"><​p lang="​en"​ dir="​ltr">​We use <a href="​https://​​dokuwiki?​ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">​@DokuWiki</​a>​ for <a href="​https://​​SeGL1Bi7Fp">​https://​​SeGL1Bi7Fp</​a>​ - easy to manage, upgrade and backup</​p>&​mdash;​ Rasmus Lerdorf (@rasmus) <a href="​https://​​rasmus/​status/​913676141558468609?​ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">​September 29, 2017</​a></​blockquote>​
 +<script async src="​https://​​widgets.js"​ charset="​utf-8"></​script></​HTML>​
why_i_picked_dokuwiki.txt ยท Last modified: 2017/12/04 15:38 (external edit)